Difference between revisions of "Male Descendents of Eleazer Whitney"

From WRG
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Automated changes by RenameBot)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
*** Eleazer<sup>5</sup> Whitney (1720-?), perhaps d. y.
 
*** Eleazer<sup>5</sup> Whitney (1720-?), perhaps d. y.
 
*** [[Family:Whitney, Thomas (1722-1806)|Thomas<sup>5</sup> Whitney (1722-1806)]] of Watertown, Shrewsbury & Westborough, MA
 
*** [[Family:Whitney, Thomas (1722-1806)|Thomas<sup>5</sup> Whitney (1722-1806)]] of Watertown, Shrewsbury & Westborough, MA
****[[Family:Whitney, Timothy (1753-a1799)|Timothy<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1753-a1799)]] of Marlborough, MA
+
****[[Family:Whitney, Timothy (1753-a1801)|Timothy<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1753-a1799)]] of Marlborough, MA
 
****[[Family:Whitney, Elijah (1761-1817)|Elijah<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1761-1817)]] of Westborough, MA
 
****[[Family:Whitney, Elijah (1761-1817)|Elijah<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1761-1817)]] of Westborough, MA
 
****[[Family:Whitney, John Smith (1768-a1810)|John Smith<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1768-a1808)]] of Shrewsbury, MA & "the west"
 
****[[Family:Whitney, John Smith (1768-a1810)|John Smith<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1768-a1808)]] of Shrewsbury, MA & "the west"
Line 15: Line 15:
 
***[[Family:Whitney, Nathan (1726-a1773)|Nathan<sup>5</sup> Whitney (1726-a1773)]] of Watertown, Spencer, Brookfield, MA & perhaps Hartford, VT
 
***[[Family:Whitney, Nathan (1726-a1773)|Nathan<sup>5</sup> Whitney (1726-a1773)]] of Watertown, Spencer, Brookfield, MA & perhaps Hartford, VT
 
****[[Family:Whitney, John (1754-a1820)|John<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1754-a1820)]] of Ware, MA & Readsboro, VT
 
****[[Family:Whitney, John (1754-a1820)|John<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1754-a1820)]] of Ware, MA & Readsboro, VT
****[[Family:Whitney, Nathan (c1756-a1800)|Nathan<sup>6</sup> Whitney (c1756-a1800)]] of Hartford, VT
+
****[[Family:Whitney, Nathan (c1756-a1832)|Nathan<sup>6</sup> Whitney (c1756-a1800)]] of Hartford, VT
 
***** A descendant has a unique Whitney DNA mutation 15/15/16
 
***** A descendant has a unique Whitney DNA mutation 15/15/16
 
****[[Family:Whitney, Eleazer (c1758-1840)|Eleazer<sup>6</sup> Whitney (c1758-1840)]] of Halifax, VT & Whitneyville, VT
 
****[[Family:Whitney, Eleazer (c1758-1840)|Eleazer<sup>6</sup> Whitney (c1758-1840)]] of Halifax, VT & Whitneyville, VT
****[[Family:Whitney, Jonathan (1761-a1810)|Jonathan<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1761-a1810)]] of Halifax, VT & Hartford, VT
+
****[[Family:Whitney, Jonathan (1761-1813)|Jonathan<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1761-a1810)]] of Halifax, VT & Hartford, VT
 
****David<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1762-1838), no known record of a marriage or children.
 
****David<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1762-1838), no known record of a marriage or children.
 
****Asa<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1773-1781)
 
****Asa<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1773-1781)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
**[[Family:Whitney, James (1697-a1743)|James<sup>4</sup> Whitney (1697-?)]] of Watertown & Waltham, MA
 
**[[Family:Whitney, James (1697-a1743)|James<sup>4</sup> Whitney (1697-?)]] of Watertown & Waltham, MA
 
***[[Family:Whitney, James (1743-1799)|James<sup>5</sup> (1743-1799)]] of Waltham, MA, Winchester, NH, & Ludlow, VT
 
***[[Family:Whitney, James (1743-1799)|James<sup>5</sup> (1743-1799)]] of Waltham, MA, Winchester, NH, & Ludlow, VT
****[[Family:Whitney, Orlando (1766-a1810)|Orlando<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1766-a1810)]] of Winchester, NH, & Ludlow, VT
+
****[[Family:Whitney, Orlando (1766-1848)|Orlando<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1766-1848)]] of Winchester, NH, & Ludlow, VT
 
****[[Family:Whitney, Daniel Thayer (1772-1857)|Daniel Thayer<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1772-1857)]] of Winchester, NH, Ludlow, VT, Cavendish, VT, St. Johnsbury, VT
 
****[[Family:Whitney, Daniel Thayer (1772-1857)|Daniel Thayer<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1772-1857)]] of Winchester, NH, Ludlow, VT, Cavendish, VT, St. Johnsbury, VT
 
****James<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1776-b1778)
 
****James<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1776-b1778)
Line 35: Line 35:
 
****[[Family:Whitney, Alexander (1789-1878)|Alexander<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1789-1878)]]
 
****[[Family:Whitney, Alexander (1789-1878)|Alexander<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1789-1878)]]
 
****[[Family:Whitney, Stephen (1792-1864)|Stephen<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1792-1864)]]
 
****[[Family:Whitney, Stephen (1792-1864)|Stephen<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1792-1864)]]
***[[Family:Whitney, Joshua (1754-a1820)|Joshua<sup>5</sup> Whitney (1754-a1794)]]
+
***[[Family:Whitney, Joshua (1754-1835)|Joshua<sup>5</sup> Whitney (1754-1835)]]
 
****Samuel Whitney (1779-1779)
 
****Samuel Whitney (1779-1779)
 
****[[Family:Whitney, Luther (1780-a1820)|Luther<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1780-?)]]
 
****[[Family:Whitney, Luther (1780-a1820)|Luther<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1780-?)]]
 
****Levi<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1783-1785)
 
****Levi<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1783-1785)
 
****Stephen<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1785-1789)
 
****Stephen<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1785-1789)
****[[Family:Whitney, John (23 Jul 1787-1844)|John<sup>6</sup> Whitney (23 Jul 1787-1844)]]
+
****[[Family:Whitney, John (1787-1844)|John<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1787-1844)]]
****[[Family:Whitney, Silas (1791-a1860)|Silas<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1791-?)]]
+
****[[Family:Whitney, Silas (1791-1866)|Silas<sup>6</sup> Whitney (1791-?)]]
 
**[[Family:Whitney, Elnathan (1705-1759)|Elnathan<sup>4</sup> Whitney (1705-1759)]]
 
**[[Family:Whitney, Elnathan (1705-1759)|Elnathan<sup>4</sup> Whitney (1705-1759)]]
 
***[[Family:Whitney, John (1731-a1760)|John<sup>5</sup> Whitney (1731-a1760)]]
 
***[[Family:Whitney, John (1731-a1760)|John<sup>5</sup> Whitney (1731-a1760)]]

Latest revision as of 12:09, 12 August 2015

Because descendants of two of Eleazer Whitney's sons have been DNA tested and show the same two marker mutation from the standard DNA signature of John Whitney's descendants, and because two descendants of a brother of Eleazer Whitney do not show this mutation, it is probably that Eleazer himself had this mutation, and was the first in the family to have it. He then passed on this minor DNA difference to his sons, and they to their sons. All male line descendants of Eleazer should have this marker.

Two other WRG members who have not been able to fully extend their lineage have tested positive for this marker, and because of this, they should concentrate their search efforts on Eleazer's branch. One other Whitney descendant has also tested positive for this marker difference, but has a lineage which apparently does not go through Eleazer.


Samuel Whitney (s1775-1808) apparently descends from Eleazer.