Difference between revisions of "Reunion 2004, Ward, Slide 14"
m |
(Automated changes by RenameBot) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
</b> | </b> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Reunion 2004, Ward, Slide 13|Back]] || [[Archive:Reunion 2004, Ward, Slide 15|Forward]] |
---- | ---- | ||
Copyright © 2004, 2006, [[User:Rlward|Robert L. Ward]] and the [[Whitney Research Group]] | Copyright © 2004, 2006, [[User:Rlward|Robert L. Ward]] and the [[Whitney Research Group]] | ||
Revision as of 04:07, 13 May 2010
Miscellaneous > Whitney Family Reunion, 2004 > Reunion 2004, Ward, Slide 14
Thoughts on Thomas Whitney of Westminster
by Robert L. Ward
26 June 2004
The Main Line
Sir James Whitney believed that the Whitneys of Castleton (including our Thomas of Westminster) were cousins. How does their father Robert fit into his family? We need to look carefully at his relatives. Here is the relevant part of the pedigree of the Whitneys of Whitney:
James Whitney = Blanche Milbourne __________|______________________________ | | | | | Sir Robert Watkin James Robert Margaret b. 1491 of Clyro | ____|___ | | | | Jenkyn Katherine _|________________________________________________ | | | | | | | | | Sir Robert John James Richard Anne Elizabeth | Charles William George | ____|___ | | | | Mary George, of Icomb |______________________________________________ | | | | | Sir James Eustace Robert Blanche Elizabeth will 1587 male line d. y. extinct
Copyright © 2004, 2006, Robert L. Ward and the Whitney Research Group
